Thursday, September 3, 2015

Reference 1

Perez-Pena, Richard. "Problems Plague System to Check Gun Buyers." The New York Times.        The New York Times, 27 July 2015. Web. 3 Sept. 2015.                                                                      <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/us/problems-riddle-system-to-check-buyers                         of-guns.html?ref=topics&_r=0>.
Summary: The author of this article aims to show people that the background check system to purchase guns is a very flawed system. He believes that the system should be fixed before any other legislation considering gun laws is created. He uses a multitude of information and data to put his point across to all types of people. For example he points out that if the system wasn’t so flawed then the SC church shooting and the LA Theater shooting could have been prevented. It was proven that both those men did not fit the guidelines to purchase a gun, but through inadequate record keeping they obtained weapons. Also he uses hard figures to demonstrate that something can be done, stating that after the VT massacre federally prohibited buyers tripled from 2006-2014. The author wrote the article in an effort to make citizens push for better gun buyer screenings, as a sure fire way to prevent some people from getting their hands on guns.
Critical Reflection: I believe the author’s audience is as many citizens across the nation as possible. He is writing for the New York Times, which is a very well read newspaper, so he must try to appeal to as many people as possible. Since he is trying to appeal to as many people as possible that causes him to support his claim from all different perspectives. He adds in information from prominent gun rights activist the NRA and anti-gun supporters like the Brady campaign to show that many sides believe that this is a good start to the solution. Also this writer works with the editors of the NY Times, so it’s safe to assume that the article was revised so that many people could relate to it and that the article is written well. This article is much unbiased compared to other resources that may be trying to argue one side of the story, such as the Progressive Cynic’s article.
Quotes: “if Mr. Houser had been involuntarily commited in his state, he could not have passed a background check” (11)
“From 2006 to 2014, the total number of prohibited buyers in the federal database tripled, to 12.9 million” (17)

“Mr. Roof, who was captured after the Charlestown shooting, was able to buy a gun because of sloppy record-keeping, officials say” (23)

No comments:

Post a Comment