This article was about
attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and the
controversies behind the disorder. I really like the title because it really
makes readers question what it is about, also it kind of follows in the line of
ADHD. The hook is good but I would like to know what ADHD stands for earlier in
the introduction rather than having to find in later in the article. Also it
was kind of confusing what “founder of ADHD” meant, maybe you could talk about
how he founded it later in the article and important discover, etc. The introduction
was good in general and provided good context on the issue. The listing of
topics helps the reader follow the article better and keeps the article more
organized. I like how the first paragraph added the authors own personal story
to the paper, and allows the reader to relate to the author better. However, I think
the first body paragraph could be elaborated on. For example, you can emphasize
more how easy it was to get a prescription. I like how the next paragraph makes
it seem like it is hard to get a prescription but the author subtlety makes it
seem easy. The body paragraphs have good transitions between them. The body
also is very strong on narrative and goo. There are prickles in the body but I think
that there could be more. I think it may be hard to find more so this is not a
big deal; also, the nature of this article does not call for a lot of prickles.
The end of the body has a few short paragraphs that seem to be a little
repetitive and could use some elaboration. It is only the draft so the author
could still be finishing. The conclusion bring a good end to the article by
bringing in everything. I really like the second to last paragraph because it
makes me connect more to the author.
No comments:
Post a Comment